retired_princesspouty

We got an early goal - the cornerstone of most of our best dismantlings of other teams.

Slavia were closing us down all over the pitch... if we hadn't taken that first opportunity things may have been significantly different. Who knows?

retired_nafrally

A quick poll regarding Theo lads. In the England thread Rats said Theo Walcott would be significantly better for England than Darren Bent or Andy Johnson. As an impact player coming off the bench. This might be seen as a bold statement as the two players have commanded transfer fees of around £30m combined, and had successful careers at club level. Is Theo's superiority to those players something that is widely accepted by Arsenal and England fans alike?

retired_omiandrea

He's far more talented than both those players, I could have told you that before yesterdays game, its just a question of condidence and getting games.

retired_monica90

And what the **** do transfer fees have to do with anything?

retired_monica90

And yes, as an impact player I'd agree he'd be the better option.

retired_csexton

On current form then i would definetly choose Walcott over Bent and Johnson and in the long run he is the better prospect so yeah i would choose him over them.

retired_Sherman6842

Johnson's career successful

retired_jessicadon

Yeah, i was saying if you look at Rooney, Crouch, Owen and Ashton being our best 4. If you are taking another option, An explosive, young guy who WILL be there in the future makes more sense than a nobody making up the numbers.

retired_khabmth

I really don't see Crouch being that good (but that is a different discussion for a different time). I fully agree with the rest though.

retired_Bluebells72

Havent said this yet, but i wanted to say a big thank you to Rob for getting me a ticket to tuesdays match, what a night to go for the first time eh!
Also thank you to Ali for saving me from being alone with the old letch