So because i've chosen to look at the list from a different point of view to yourself, i'm taking a stance on something on purpose? This is nothing to do with me being bored in work, this is me deciding not to take the list at face value and just completely overreact.
Look - I genuinely believe that the criteria they've used is wrong. I also believe that there are some players on there that really shouldnt be there at all, while there are also players there that really wouldnt be considered otherwise when they arguably deserve to be considered.
Lists of these nature are by their nature subjective, Statistics to determine a players relative ability are also subjective. As a result, any list that identifies the top players using statistics is obviously going to be subjective.