Quote:
Originally posted by Nick OGS20:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Gregg Carter:
It's actually not too bad a list with regards to the actual people on it for the most part. There are people missing that arguably should be there, but you're never going to please everybody with lists of this kind. You could have 200 players and you'd still upset people.
Their relative placings of course can be argued and if we were all to make a list ourselves, we would probably find that they would all be very different.
|
nah, complete rubbish Gregg. i suspect you know that and you're doing your usual devil's advocatey type thing. hope so anyway.
George Best not being in the top 100 renders the list null and void from the outset. </BLOCKQUOTE>
How is it complete rubbish to suggest that many yet not all of the people in that list should feature in most top 100 lists but not neccessarily in the order they appear in this list?