| » Stats |
Members: 103,356
Threads: 84,986
Posts: 1,031,253
Top Poster: Karky (9,545) | | Welcome to our newest member, ankkaewrae | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | |
11-10-2007, 03:38 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #111 | | Newb
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Sunderland can be happy with that. They deserved to win, played all the football and had all the bad luck. Point still a good point in their situation.
Newcastle just gash. That rubbish 'hoooof' chant basically invented for them.
Martins and Stokes with the dives at the end. |
| |
11-10-2007, 04:07 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #112 | | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 |
Craig Gordon is pish.
|
| |
11-10-2007, 04:35 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #113 | | Newb
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Happy enough with the point today. Sunderland the better side and can feel disappointed that they didn't win the game. We didn't play well at all - our passing was disjointed and we again lacked width. Barton still unfit for me and also something of a liability with the kick out at Etuhu. However, we showed a bit of character to pull level, so that's something.
We are clearly still work in progress and Fat Sam needs to get a settled side, instead of tinkering with it every week.
|
| |
11-10-2007, 06:15 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #114 | | Newb
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Atmosphere was pretty poor today - I was certainly expecting a lot more, having seen the Geordies hanging out of the windows of a metro train like ****ing animals on the way to the ground.
Still, Sunderland deserved to win but a draw is still fair seeing as the Mackems were god awful in the final third.
Fair play to Ashley though.
|
| |
11-10-2007, 06:18 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #115 | | Newb
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote: |
Fair play to Ashley though.
| Yup - the big man seemed to enjoy himself. I wonder if he'll do that more regularly for away games ?
|
| |
11-10-2007, 06:33 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #116 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0 |
Thought we were utterly pants today, Sunderland deserved the win by a long way (And it takes a lot for me to type that out!).
We never looked like scoring, even when we scored. We had no width, no flair, no attacking impetus at all.
|
| |
11-10-2007, 09:42 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #117 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
obviously neither team wanted it enough |
| |
11-10-2007, 09:48 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #118 | | Newb
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by atvkwkad:
obviously neither team wanted it enough | I disagree - the mackems looked well up for it an with better finishing, should have won.
Are your lads going to do their usual roll over and die act at St Andrews tomorrow ?
|
| |
11-10-2007, 09:51 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #119 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
i look forward to the usual second city derby comedy japes.
|
| |
11-10-2007, 09:54 PM
|
The 138th Tyne-Wear Derby, Mackems v Newcastle Sat 12:45 SS1 & HD1 Post #120 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Big Geordie:
Are your lads going to do their usual roll over and die act at St Andrews tomorrow ?
| they won last time they went there tbf
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | » Online Users: 15 | | 1 members and 14 guests | | mnop884 | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |