| » Stats |
Members: 103,468
Threads: 85,004
Posts: 1,031,271
Top Poster: Karky (9,545) | | Welcome to our newest member, TheJayDoe | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | |
11-07-2007, 12:10 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #11 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
My company is running an online media analysis system for the DCMS. We needed to keep it simple and allowing the user little or no opportunity to feck things up operationally.
Users are generally complete morons and unless they have some knowlege of the systems or area they are working in, which few are, why allow them that flexibility ?
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:10 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #12 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by batch:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Can you not feedback issues with the software to the developers.
| We had a chance to do that when we got our new system as i've described above. What seemed like a plane load of Yanks came over for a week to speak to everyone about what they needed from the system, what needed changing, making better etc.
They never did any of it as far as i am aware </BLOCKQUOTE>
We had a handful of "experts" showing us/helping us with queries today. A few of them had only just used the system this morning, and werent meant to be the ones we could turn to for help
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:12 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #13 | | Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Sounds pretty much like my day tbh.
New system in at customers, hand holding etc. Difference Is I know how it works and you can correct your mistakes.
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:14 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #14 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Surely it would just be best if the NHS got its own in house IT department? With the money they're spending on it, developing much of their software in house could possibly be a more efficient solution. As far as I'm aware they currently out source all of this to major IT consultancies?
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:19 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #15 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Dicom developed this system, if anyone has heard of them?
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:19 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #16 | | Joe Blow
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by theis:
Surely it would just be best if the NHS got its own in house IT department? With the money they're spending on it, developing much of their software in house could possibly be a more efficient solution. As far as I'm aware they currently out source all of this to major IT consultancies?
| If you think external IT companies are inefficient, think what a disaster civil service IT operations would make of organising a nation wide NHS system.
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:21 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #17 | | Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Yeh
The NHS D1k4 IT Department would be a fantastic hole for cash to get poured into.
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:21 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #18 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
What xbilly said.
It's completely impractical at the moment, which is why the trusts are outsourcing.
Add in that the trusts are responsible for their own IT as opposed to the NHS as a whole and it would be an utter nightmare trying to get them all to be synchronised. You'd be talking costs in the millions just to do that.
Not practical in any way shape or form.
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:21 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #19 | | Newb
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
batch - Misys are a bunch of cowboys anyway - one company that I would NEVER work for in any way - despite them advertising positions at their Worcester office that even I could do well.
We had a superb computer appointments system when I worked at the main hospital in Worcester years ago.
It would book clinics when no doctors were available, cancel them at random when doctors were around, and here's the deal breaker.
It used to send letters out to families of deceased patients telling them that said dead patient was to attend clinic.
And that was not a one off either
|
| |
11-07-2007, 12:23 AM
|
Genius of the NHS Post #20 | | Newb
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by xbilly:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by theis:
Surely it would just be best if the NHS got its own in house IT department? With the money they're spending on it, developing much of their software in house could possibly be a more efficient solution. As far as I'm aware they currently out source all of this to major IT consultancies?
| If you think external IT companies are inefficient, think what a disaster civil service IT operations would make of organising a nation wide NHS system. </BLOCKQUOTE>
ha, true. I was thinking more of a private sector firms internal IT departments. Forgot that a public sector one would essentially be a many billion pound blackhole.
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
More threads of Paul Bacon | | Thread | Date | Forum | Replies | Last Post | Time to blame games again for random killings...
Time to blame games again for random killings...: That last bit is more shocking than the killings....
| 12-06-2007 | The Pub | 106 | 12-07-2007 01:50 AM | Elf - C4 @ 4:45pm
Elf - C4 @ 4:45pm: The first Will Ferrell film i saw and my...
| 12-02-2007 | The Pub | 32 | 12-02-2007 08:51 PM | Any plans for 2031?
Any plans for 2031?: Yeah i know there is a thread but this deserves...
| 11-29-2007 | The Pub | 33 | 11-30-2007 01:54 PM | PC World just get better :D
PC World just get better :D: Just seen the ad for this and couldnt believe it,...
| 11-28-2007 | The Pub | 45 | 11-29-2007 08:30 PM | Feel gutted for someone at work
Feel gutted for someone at work: A long story that goes back aawhile but basically...
| 11-27-2007 | The Pub | 2 | 11-27-2007 05:59 PM | | » Online Users: 32 | | 0 members and 32 guests | | No Members online | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |