alidog

dingo

For someone with such a chip on their shoulder about the state of the research, I'm rather surprised that in the last 2 years you've only posted once in the data forum.

retired_fgooden

how can you see players potential ? using editor, or there is some option in game i missed.

retired_secretdiet

Means PAY people to do the job right bozoo!!!

Something that you dont know probably. </BLOCKQUOTE>

the fact is the researchers will actually see these players play so unless you have gone around and seen all the 50 players play at leats 10 times i dont see how you can be better placed to judge their potential then the researcher as i said if your unhappy go into the data issues forum but tbh there is no need for the insults as it will get you nowhere

mfox

I Have got many players of those through my career in Barca..

Running my third season and i was so angry that Thiago refused to renew his contract with me and went to real madrid..

so i snapped Bueno From them.. And also got Valencia's Aroan on a free transefer.

Got Kerlon and lent him until he is 20 now and scornig 17 goals for Betis in 23 games
Also Lago Would make an amazing replacement for people who are searching for ronaldinho type of players... He IS AWSOME

I got Merida as a recommendation From Bojan and now i got 4 players from the Spain under 21st national team

All for free

One Last thing Guys Look For Vantagiato and Sobis.. would be amazing for mid table teams.. Sobis is currently having 13 goals in 10 games with 18 assists

All Players who were linked to Henry are on fire

retired_Fiteach

??? I dont have any chip on any shoulder, I just point it out something that I think is important part of the game that need to be look at.

retired_jfin22

Isnt that list just for some magazine? So what makes it more right than the fm list of wonderkids?
Surely its all just opinion and what one person thinks has lots of talent another person might see nothing.
To be honest i think this list is less well researched because most of these players are very well known. The fact that Tejera is in the list shows that it's not great because as someone else said he's not even in the top 10 youngsters at chelsea, and is probably only in the list because before he went to chelsea, real madrid and barca wanted him.

retired_denis

Is this the list from World Soccer?

Don't forget that the players they have picked are predictions to be big in the future, just like the PA in FM, so some of them will never make it to the big time or will just play for average top flight teams.

The number of times you hear about the next big thing and you never hear about them again or 10 years down the line their playing in the lower leagues or back in their homeland, is uncountable.

Have you checked their stats after the game has started or are their PA's set before the game i.e. not -10, -9 etc.

retired_Turkishdelight

dingo, not for nothing, but dude, do u think before you speak? can u imagine the costs involved with getting "thousands" of paid researchers to check out the players? seriously, remember the cost of the game, and then think of how much higher the cost would be, blah blah blah. Furthermore, i'd highly recommend this real easy technique, called, DATA EDITOR!!! Thats right, got a player with a low PA, not happy about it, BOOM!! DATA EDITORIZE him!

Getting back to the researchers, i for one think they do a damn good job all things considered. Here in Hungary, i know for a fact they have multiple researchers checking out the players, teams, etc. For that matter, keep in mind all the playable leagues, etc, etc. bottom line, SI does an admirable job getting all the players data. If you've a better, actual intelligent suggestion, i'm sure SI would appreciate it, until then, use the Date editor to fix what you're not happy about

W

leanwitit

As a Chelsea fan, I disagree. I've not heard anything from him, but Scott Sinclair, he's been described as 'Explosive' more than enough times, so perhaps it is him he should be on the list, not Tejera. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Explosive ?? probably pre-match nerves

train

Not saying you're wrong (Time will judge that, not me), but who says that it's not the list that's incorrect and that the SI database is spot on?

It's impossible to say here and now who is under / over rated with regards to potential unless you have access to a time machine. You may well be right, I'm not denying that, but you state your opinions as if they're stone cold facts. They're not. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Couldnt agree more mate :thup: