Quote:
Originally posted by Francis Cole:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Sir Bert Preast:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Francis Cole:
<BLOCKQUOTE>And I don't get how you can think that not having your child in your eyesight 24/7 constitutes negligence
|
There a difference between being in your eyesight, and being down the street for an hour? </BLOCKQUOTE>
An hour? What does that matter? You only have to be negligent for the minute or two that's unlucky enough to count. </BLOCKQUOTE>
In terms of an hour (
imo) is a long time to leave a 3 year old in a hotel room by herself while you are away down the street.
Obviously that's just me though by this thread, so fair enough

</BLOCKQUOTE>
Not saying it's good. I'm saying it happens and the vast majority of people get away with it just fine. These two didn't. So I wonder why a father who ****s up on the road and loses a kid is covered in sympathy, while this chap is being ostracised?