If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Originally posted by golfpunk:
He'll get you about 5+ goals from freekicks a season. Not a bad return from a LB. He can also play ML so is a good option for back up.
I usually score 5+ with my current players. I have plenty of ML too. Do you think he's better than Criscito and Clichy?
I€keep in mind I have a transfer budget of 80M, so 15M is nothing (I have a huge squad so I wont be buying any other players soon).
I never play Clichy. He's out on loan every season. I only play Criscito.
I thought Bale was a lot better than Clichy
:eek:
You must be kidding me! Clichy is brilliant dude. Stop sending him on loan and keep him in the side. He's one of the best LB's in the game. He's better overall than Criscito. Criscito is rubbish going forward but great defensively. Clichy is great at both. You should have got Chiellini instead of Criscito. He's much better.
As for the question, no dont waste your money on Bale. Get Traore instead if you do want to buy someone. He's much better.
Originally posted by theincrediblehulk:
<BLOCKQUOTE>I never play Clichy. He's out on loan every season. I only play Criscito.
I thought Bale was a lot better than Clichy
:eek:
You must be kidding me! Clichy is brilliant dude. Stop sending him on loan and keep him in the side. He's one of the best LB's in the game. He's better overall than Criscito. Criscito is rubbish going forward but great defensively. Clichy is great at both. You should have got Chiellini instead of Criscito. He's much better.
As for the question, no dont waste your money on Bale. Get Traore instead if you do want to buy someone. He's much better. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Oh, should I play Clichy instead of Criscito then? It's just that I compared them and Criscito seemed better overall. Criscito is playing on a 7.27 too so far (27 matches).
I tried buying Chiellini but they rejected my 38M offer, so I bought Criscito for 31.5 instead.
Also, I just done and overview comparison between Criscito and Clichy, and Criscito still seems so much better. The only thing Clichy is better at is speed, and they're the same technically, but Criscito is so much better at everything else.
Well, in my game Crisicto is rubbish going forward. His dribbling and crossing stats are terrible. His defensive are awesome though. Clichy is very good in all departments. Crossing, dribbling, tackling, marking, concentration are all 15 and above. Traore is even better at all these stats! But maybe Criscito is good in your game. I dont know.
Anyway, as for Clichy's performance, he generally had an AR of 7.42 and 7.46 in my two seasons. And gets around 7-8 assists per season as well. Brilliant.
Traore got only around 20 games in the first season and had an AR of 7.42. He got around 30 games in the second season and averaged 7.61. But thats a little misleading because Clichy always played in the bigger games and in most league matches. Traore played in all FA Cup, Carling Cup matches and a few league as well.
Wow that is very good. Criscito struggles to get 4 assists in a season. He's played 28 this season, and no assists or goals yet. I see what you mean, he is all about defence.
I'm going to recall Clichy from loan and use hm in every other match, I'll see how it goes. I'm gonna try buy Traore too if he comes for less than 20M, hes only 22 and looks better than Clichy (age 26).