[bunor90]

Originally posted by BBB:
http://www.digitaldirectuk.com/produ...oduct_id=11189

yay or nay?

Nay the resouloutioun is poor it should be 1366x768 minimum, higher the resouloition the better the picture having said that it is cheap and it is still HD but I would look for something better.

[retired_jshendel]

Originally posted by Tony7:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by BBB:
http://www.digitaldirectuk.com/produ...oduct_id=11189

yay or nay?

Nay the resouloutioun is poor it should be 1366x768 minimum, higher the resouloition the better the picture having said that it is cheap and it is still HD but I would look for something better. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Can only display 480p which isnt HD (standard sets display that)

I did read on a forum that the US class 480p as HD, but its not really

[retired_Ms. Fit]

standard sets do 480i afaik, not 480p.

[retired_jshendel]

So it is.

That TV BBB linked to is classed as Enhanced-definition television which is different from HDTV

[bunor90]

I think the standard set is 480i but if you use component it cant make it progresive picture. I think the gamecube did that but 480p is not HD. I thought the tv was HD but if it can't do 720p which is the minimum for HD then I would def give it a miss.

[Loo]

Here are a few LCD tv's I'm trying to decide on..

SAMSUNG LE32S62

Samsung 32" LCD-TV LE32R32B

Samsung 32" LCD-TV LE32R83B

Samsung 32" LCD-TV LE32S71

Samsung 32" LCD-TV LE32S81B


If you've got any opinions/views on these that'd be great, thanks.

[Loo]

Mind yer heads.

[Starling2003]

I'm getting the Samsung R83 :thup:

[retired_abess]

Compatible BAD
Ready GOOD

[Loo]

Sorry Serpico but I'm completely clueless in this department. What do you mean exactly?