Quote:
Originally posted by Andy Jordan:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Klimowicz:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Andy Jordan:
<BLOCKQUOTE>Originally posted by Klimowicz:
both great midfielders. cesc because i'm a gunner.
xavi > ineista anyway.
|
quite intrigued by this assessment, given that I disagree wholeheartedly.
what's your reasoning, if you don't mind? </BLOCKQUOTE>
i followed barca as long as i have arsenal, for me xavi is a great playmaker. iniesta is great as i said, but i would prefer xavi with deco and toure for his overall defensive/attacking qualities. if you need a goal from the bench, iniesta is your man.
tbh, i could have gone either way. </BLOCKQUOTE>:eek:
as a Barça supporter, I can't have Xavi, Deco, and Toure all in front of Iniesta (unless you're going Iniesta/Messi/Henry or Eto'o). </BLOCKQUOTE>
depends, really. if xavi was a fixture then, who out of toure & deco would you drop? i just feel having a player like iniesta on the bench gives you more leverage if you need an attacking change. don't get me wrong, i can see your arguement, but i like xavi.
so if barca bought cesc, what then?