themavsman

You tell me

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/8937/85536657vq7.jpg

Chas (Psyatika)

No. You tell me

http://community.sigames.com/eve/for...732030253/p/13

Aino

Except that, for some reason, Man U only goes through 10 shooters before cycling back to the original shooter (Owen Hargreaves), whereas Reading uses all 11 shooters.

Note that Reading's 11th shooter (Mikkel Andersen) scores on the same line with Man U's repeat 1st shooter (Hargreaves).

Methinks this is a bogus screenshot.

J-beth

Maybe the red card that man u recived in the 107th minute, is the answer to that

Aino

touché

MuzGB70

Maybe the red card that man u recived in the 107th minute, is the answer to that </BLOCKQUOTE>

If a side have men sent off, the opposition team can only use the same quantity of players in a penalty shootout as the reduced team. The non-taking players must be named before the shootout starts.

Daniel Foster

Maybe the red card that man u recived in the 107th minute, is the answer to that </BLOCKQUOTE>

If a side have men sent off, the opposition team can only use the same quantity of players in a penalty shootout as the reduced team. The non-taking players must be named before the shootout starts. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Maybe in real life but perhaps not in the game?

Gareth Winter

Maybe the red card that man u recived in the 107th minute, is the answer to that </BLOCKQUOTE>

If a side have men sent off, the opposition team can only use the same quantity of players in a penalty shootout as the reduced team. The non-taking players must be named before the shootout starts. </BLOCKQUOTE>

I think they can choose to use all 11.
There was a match this season sometime where the keeper was forced to take one even though he was injured, as they had not declared that he wouldnt take one. Cant remember what game it was though