» Site Navigation | | | » Stats |
Members: 47,883
Threads: 82,524
Posts: 1,027,936
Top Poster: Peacemaker7 (3,025) | | Welcome to our newest member, nikemate | |  | |
12-24-2003, 11:07 PM
|
#41 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 3 |
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by exchampionsfan:
posting in the wrong place is bloody unhelpful as well<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
but the point is, they are playing an online game and its pretty reasonable to look/post for help in the Official CM Online Forum |
| |
12-24-2003, 11:42 PM
|
#42 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 2 |
Wow this thread looks like Bachdad (Iraq) on the day the Americans took over :thup:
|
| |
12-24-2003, 11:55 PM
|
#43 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 742
Rep Power: 40 |
never heard of a place called bachdad before |
| |
12-25-2003, 12:01 AM
|
#44 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 3 |
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BelfastNiall:
Secondly - The biggest bug-bear for me has always been the amount of players who come on here, apply for clan games, turn up for a session or two and then disappear leaving you in the lurch. For example in my CM4 game, I had a player who turned up on night one as Man U, signed all the best youths including Rooney, and never showed his face again. This user was then in many threads afterwards regarding games. In my opinion, some form of warning or yellow card, or ideally a blacklist should be made available to discourage these people from behaving in such a manner. Obviously these people should only be blacklisted when A: There is a legitimate reason like above, B: The complainer or host has a reliable reputaton as a CM gamer. These people are the most irritating twats in CMO.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah there are people like this, but I don’t like yellows/reds, blacklist etc, they aren’t constructive in the slightest, are far too subjective and they give no way back for the user, as they would never get a chance to redeem themselves, as mud generally sticks. This will always happen and no amount of blacklist and cards will stop it. I mean the bloke you mentioned above might just have thought that he didn’t have anything in common with you on a non-cm level, or maybe he just thought you weren’t upto his standard :p, he should have had the decency to inform you of his decision regarding not playing anymore, thats a given, but what one person thinks is a legitimate reason for some form of punishment, another may not, it is just a big can of worms that once opened, ends up causing problems.
|
| |
12-25-2003, 12:03 AM
|
#45 | | Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 |
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ChampHolic:
never heard of a place called bachdad before  <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I assume that's how they spell it in Holland
|
| |
12-25-2003, 12:07 AM
|
#46 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 2 |
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Carl McDean:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BelfastNiall:
Secondly - The biggest bug-bear for me has always been the amount of players who come on here, apply for clan games, turn up for a session or two and then disappear leaving you in the lurch. For example in my CM4 game, I had a player who turned up on night one as Man U, signed all the best youths including Rooney, and never showed his face again. This user was then in many threads afterwards regarding games. In my opinion, some form of warning or yellow card, or ideally a blacklist should be made available to discourage these people from behaving in such a manner. Obviously these people should only be blacklisted when A: There is a legitimate reason like above, B: The complainer or host has a reliable reputaton as a CM gamer. These people are the most irritating twats in CMO.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah there are people like this, but I don’t like yellows/reds, blacklist etc, they aren’t constructive in the slightest, are far too subjective and they give no way back for the user, as they would never get a chance to redeem themselves, as mud generally sticks. This will always happen and no amount of blacklist and cards will stop it. I mean the bloke you mentioned above might just have thought that he didn’t have anything in common with you on a non-cm level, or maybe he just thought you weren’t upto his standard :p, he should have had the deceny to inform you of his decision regarding not playing anymore, thats a given, but what one person thinks is a legitimate reason for some form of punishment, another may not, it is just a big can of worms that once opened, ends up causing problems.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Agree, however I would like a blacklist.
Lets call it Bahdad then s*ckers. :o
|
| |
12-25-2003, 12:15 AM
|
#47 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 242
Rep Power: 6 |
it's Baghdad |
| |
12-25-2003, 12:43 AM
|
#48 | | Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 |
going off topic a bit here guys, stay on 'changes to CMO' |
| |
12-25-2003, 12:52 AM
|
#49 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 6 |
I agree with Dogs. I don't feel the community is as tight as it should be. There needs to be a feeling of a community rather than some clans just having some banter.
Im not too sure if a lot can be done about it. The idea of Online Tournaments is not a bad one. However I feel this takes players away from their clan games, it would need to be organised so that no-one has objections to not playing clan games. Personally I would rather just get on with the clan game and leave the rest to banter. We don't need to know who is THE best, there is more to life.
As for this name and shame thingy, it has its pros and cons. It would spoil people having their online fix if they messed up a clan game accidently/with a legitimate reason. However if they are genuinely fools, they need to be taught a lesson. Its a tough one to decipher. I think its all down to personal views by clan members/hosts. I think there should be an unposted blacklist that the mods have. Only dealt with hosts/organisers where persistent offenders should be reprimanded.
I also think having 'recognised' clans pages stickied is not good idea. I can forsee many clans just stickied at the top with no movement in the forum. Maybe a list of recognised clans in order of seniority (if there is to be any segregation) is better.
Goldy I will pop you an email re: FAQs.
I will go away and think of ideas myself as Xmas in the Phenom hoosehold don't exist and I'll be much sober-er
|
| |
12-25-2003, 12:56 AM
|
#50 | | Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 |
Pat - i'm not sure if you were here when they had the recognised clans at the top of the forum. It was in the forum header with a link to the clan website and topic |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | » Online Users: 34 | | 0 members and 34 guests | | No Members online | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |