If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Jeez effin' wept! Must this tired old redundant question, summarily put down by SI each year, keep rearing it's futile and ugly head?
It's Football Manager, when the ME and Scouting, and Transfers, and Skin and everything else is perfect and all the licenses have bee afforded, and Anderson is skinning instead of Ter, and the game runs on minimum resources, and the database is updated live from a central server ingame.... then, and only then, might there be room for pointless irrelevant cosmetics like houses and crap.
I suppose you'll all want to decorate your big pink bedrooms and choose whether to take your boyfriends for rides on the wild baloney pony too?
Originally posted by ne02oo3:
This is what im saying ...there is no incentive to be given a bigger wage packet, you might aswell accept a £1 contract and let the board keep the rest of the money ..
Quote:
The wages are there for stability. There is already a reason for them and spending them is rather pointless really.
I assure you that having higher wages makes it harder to be sacked. It's the same reason that another club may look you over for a job, because they have to pay compensation. There is no need to be able to spend them.
Quote:
I think I owe Neji and neO2oo3 and apology, I was answering like a twat and I tell people off for it. Sorry.
Don't worry about it, it is kind of annoying that the same idea get's posted time and time again :thup:
Originally posted by Icelander83:
Well, the thread-starter got one thing right, it would be quite amazing if this was included in the game. Just really not in a positive way