retired_fdsjr5765

Why not? Cant you use a slow build up play style?

retired_elpata

Slow build up and be attacking? Its a confiction of instructions. Attacking for example means you go forward and are always looking to break. To then play slow empo just doesn't make sense.

retired_xnikkix

glory untd i am still testin ya tactic and the slow passing is fine way more goals scored uv proven ur poin with me will post a email 2 u with the results when i have finished

retired_fdsjr5765

Thanks man.

But if you want to keep hold of possession and are by far the better team would it not be wise to play slow. I dont do it but surely it is possible? I mean if you are defensive and playing on the counter then you should be playing quick no? And if there is no use for slow tempo in an attacking tactic then does this make slow tempo obsolete and fast tempo categorically the best way to go?

retired_elpata

I find slows works best for stoppng the opposition having oo much of the ball. You know like in the hard away games or against teams who have someone you simply cannot handle.

retired_xnikkix

slow works well away as being proven by ur tactic testing i am doing the only time u have a problem is when the teams a weaker one like dam 1860 munchen 0-0 but some how had more shots on target than all the other games ??? baffling ??? lol

retired_fdsjr5765

The tactic I gave you plays with a fast tempo

So Cleon would you say, if you are a strong team, you should really only use a slow tempo to kill of a game or hold onto a lead or play for a draw etc.

retired_hope

Slow build up and be attacking? Its a confiction of instructions. Attacking for example means you go forward and are always looking to break. To then play slow empo just doesn't make sense. </BLOCKQUOTE>

Cleon this isn't the case, of course you can play an attacking game at a slow tempo.

retired_vssankari

My favorite tactic in FM07 was a variant of WWFan's Control, which was an attacking tactic with slow tempo.

My best tactics in FM08 have been counterattacking - but I'm working on a 4-5-1 slow tempo attacking tactic that facilitates the breaking-down of ultra defensive sides. I don't see a contradiction.

retired_elpata

Thats how I tend to play yes

I know you can hve mderate success, but its a conradiction. I think one of the manulas used to state that too. Your asking the players to play 2 different ways. You want them to play attacking and get forward at every opportunity, then in the next instance you want them to play a slow build up.

It just doesn't make sense no matter what.