retired_exoticpanther33

oh ffs..
come on then... who do YOU think ought to pay for it?

if someone got sacked every time a pc game was launched with bugs, there'd be very few programmers still in work.

3 things certain in life: death, taxes and all software will have bugs.
with a bit of luck though, the software you buy will be from a developer decent enough to commit to decent aftercare, and who will release patches etc to improve the software after release...

now if ONLY SI would so something like that...

oh... wait...

retired_terata

Of course, SI are the only company on earth that ever need to patch thier games aren't they.

Or wait, no, is that 187 pages worth of patches? **** me!! Trading Standards might need to expand by several thousand people then.

Hahahah... noobs such knobjockeys!!

retired_Belljar24

really?? i cant think of any games other than fm i buy that are full of stupid bugs </BLOCKQUOTE>


Well you're not thinking hard enough then. </BLOCKQUOTE>
ok smartypants, you tell me what games i have bought that have bugs in them! </BLOCKQUOTE>


Tell you what.... Since you think you're so clever so me documented proof that you've bought one that doesn't.

You're the one that's making this assertion. I'm the one questioning it. The onus is on you to provide the proof. Time to put up or shut up sonny boy.

Dav1d

Ever heard of CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM? There are tons of threads in here that say bad things about SI that don't get closed. The ones which do get closed are the pointless drivel you posted. Aslong as it's constructive, it's fine.