A little clarification that I feel necessary:
1) I have never suggested that rating system is buged or completely broken. I fully understand that it is just a matter of tweaks from technical perspective and a matter of approach to the issue as such. If you want the game to reflect the newspapers approach - then it's fine. If you want this system to add some depth to add some depth to the gameplay, then a wider variety of ratings should be achievable without the need of miracles.
2) I have already admited that 10s are not an issue in my book. Let them stay hard to achieve. But 9... I think at the moment it is a little to much out of reach - not something I have never seen (saw it once after hat-trick), but still, should be possible to see it a little bit more often
3) You can hardly consider me one of the moaners, just read my posts and the tone they are kept in. You will notice the difference. And, besides, I do play the game and I do have a lot of pleasure coming from it. And I WILL buy 09 when it comes

Am I a moaner?

4) To what Bodis wrote - I will try to pick some after match report while I play. It's not even to prove my point, but to have a little discussion on how the system works. Even comparison of two different players on such screen sometimes raises some questions as to how the system rates them...