| » Stats |
Members: 103,403
Threads: 84,986
Posts: 1,031,253
Top Poster: Karky (9,546) | | Welcome to our newest member, ankkavfrav | |
If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
 | |
11-24-2007, 03:56 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #31 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
There is a sticky thread which basically says they don't post as much on here due to all the idiots on here, and I don't blame them.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 04:01 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #32 | | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Surely they should get on here & reply to questions though?, just ignore the idiots. I have no beef with SI but they must watch that they dont get considered as acting "above" the games fanbase.
For what its worth I think FM07 was shxxe but FM08 is awesome.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 04:02 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #33 | | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am too missing the SI people in these fora. 
I guess they don't enjoy being here anymore, but I still don't understand it: The same "vitriol" and slating happened when CM4 came out, but they were around.
I really don't understand this. They are just tired, I think.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 04:40 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #34 | | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Ackter:
<BLOCKQUOTE>so when their testing regiment is obviously not good enough
| Absolute rubbish. </BLOCKQUOTE>
How about you start with making these forums nicer by not telling others that they're naive, stupid and talk absolute rubbish.
Or, how about you tell us why the testing regimen is good enough in your opinion? Many of us have intimate knowledge of testing processes and I'm sure many would like to know if SI is using some of the latest and most succesfull methods.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 04:49 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #35 | | Newb
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 |
Ackter gets frustrated because he sees the same mud throw around at the testers all the time from people who (through no fault of their own) are ignorant of testing process. He does need a slap every now and then to get him to calm down a bit.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 04:56 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #36 | | Newb
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote: |
Many of us have intimate knowledge of testing processes
| |
| |
11-24-2007, 05:02 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #37 | | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |  Indeed DJ.
On another note,
For those who haven't tested it's difficult to understand that's 99.99% sure a bug making it to the gold stage has already been spotted and logged beforehand.
However, it's easier to spot and log a bug than to fix it completely. The line has to be drawn somewhere and once the bugs considered 'critical' have been sorted it's only a matter of how many irritating bugs can be sorted before the game/patch has to be released.
|
| |
11-24-2007, 11:37 PM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #38 | | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by UELLfan: Indeed DJ.
| You don't think there's a lot of software engineers on these forums? Quote: |
However, it's easier to spot and log a bug than to fix it completely.
| I have said this before, but in a game that features full simulations, bugs should not be spotted by testers, but by a testing suite. In old-fashioned development teams bugs can be hard to fix because they are detected late and the programmer has made too many changes between the previous version and this one. Or, and to me this is an indication SI is using the old-fashioned methods, often new bugs are introduced by bug fixes and are not detected until a human tests the new version.
If features are automatically (run-time) tested after every compilation, the developer has a much better idea of which line(s) of code caused it. If that same bug is not detected until a week later by a human beta tester, the tester will first have to convince the developer that the bug exists, then has to go back and forth trying to pinpoint it, then the developer has to go through multiple versions trying to detect when the bug was introduced, figure out what code was changed and then finally pinpoint the exact line(s) that caused it... Now, which method is faster do you think?
In other words, the testing method can most certainly be the problem.
|
| |
11-25-2007, 12:21 AM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #39 | | Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
And a method which has limited scope for such an open-ended title such as FM.
Sureit works for the majority of games, but the majority of games are completely set in stone. FM isn't even close to being "set" in any way.
|
| |
11-25-2007, 01:00 AM
|
SI used to be one of us Post #40 | | Newb
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Rep Power: 0 | Quote:
Originally posted by Glyn:
FM2010 will have had two year's work on it from now whether an FM2009 gets released or not. Not releasing an FM2009 isn't going to change the laws of time.
| Exactly. This goes hand in hand with people calling for no more patches this year, just writing it off and getting on with FM09, with the aim of making it more bug free...
They don't seem to realise that right now, there's a bulk of code called "Football Manager". We play it, testers play it, SI get feedback and try to improve it. Every now and then we get a newer version in the form of a "patch", and once a year we get the latest version in the form of a "new game", but at heart, FM09 will be FM08, just with a year's more work and a few new features. SI could release a patch a week or a game every 2 years, FM10 will still be the same game when it hits the stores...
After all, it isn't a new game, it's merely "Football Manager", at the state it's evolved into in October 2010.
|
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
More threads of TimNCarrington | | Thread | Date | Forum | Replies | Last Post | International retirement
International retirement: Hi,
Is it possible to set up international...
| 07-03-2008 | Football Manager | 2 | 07-03-2008 09:25 AM | Editing awards
Editing awards: Can you do this on the editor and can you make...
| 01-08-2008 | Skinning Hideout | 3 | 01-08-2008 05:10 PM | Harrogate Town
Harrogate Town: Hi, why are Harrogate always poor on FM, in real...
| 01-08-2008 | Football Manager | 2 | 01-08-2008 04:05 PM | Database
Database: I cant seem to start anew game it wont load up...
| 01-06-2008 | Football Manager | 1 | 01-07-2008 12:08 AM | SI used to be one of us
SI used to be one of us: Where are you guys, I know you are busy, but in...
| 11-24-2007 | Football Manager | 39 | 11-25-2007 01:00 AM |
Other threads in forum Football Manager | | Thread | Date | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post | Quick question about international management?
Quick question about international management?: Hoping to take over an international team when a...
| 06-30-2008 | crouchaldinho | 0 | 06-30-2008 05:03 AM | FMH 08 PSP sugar daddy no more CASH
FMH 08 PSP sugar daddy no more CASH: members..
PSP version fmh 08 before the...
| 06-04-2008 | Moschino02 | 3 | 06-05-2008 06:36 AM | Game Crash : Help
Game Crash : Help: Something about a serious error at the C:/ Crash...
| 02-05-2008 | celtcolm1 | 1 | 02-05-2008 11:21 PM | Does anyone else suffer from loyalty problems on FM?
Does anyone else suffer from loyalty problems on FM?: Firstly, I can never decide which team to manage....
| 01-29-2008 | jameslewis | 3 | 01-29-2008 08:42 PM | If win champo league
If win champo league: If u win the champions league and finish outside...
| 04-21-2006 | coolydanny | 13 | 04-23-2006 07:47 PM | | » Online Users: 26 | | 0 members and 26 guests | | No Members online | | Most users ever online was 2,128, 07-21-2008 at 08:27 PM. | |