retired_sherrymccarty

When I start at a new club I change the coaches roles by offering them new contracts. So Youth and First Team become simply 'Coaches' and are now able to coach everyone. I only do it for Goalkeeping and Fitness coaches if they are going to change the catergory their are coaching in. This usually comes at a financial cost which I accept.
But I was wondering if this is a good idea or if I would get better results leaving them in their original roles? How much emphasis does the game put on workload vs star ratings? Does the game take the light workloads from a coach coaching both the first and youth teams, put them together and give him an overall medium workload, reducing his effectiveness? Should I have a coach with a low 'working with youngsters' rating, not take any youth coaching duties because its reducing his first team coaching effectiveness?

retired_redhotxpress

I haven't noticed an effect of looking at it in such detail.

I do have a few coaches with bad rating in youth work, but my youth still seems to develop just fine in their area of work.

In the end of hte day I think it is important that every coach has a low workload, in order to do his job properly.

I think most ppl here do what you do: only have a "coach", also due to staff limitations that makes sense already.

the workload it shows for a coach is the workload he's got.

I always have seen youth training and senior training as not running parallel, therefor a coach will not have a problem dealing with both of them. Let's face it, regarding a normal workday, football players do not really train THAT much every single day, so there is plenty of time for the coaches to do their work throughout the day without getting stressed