If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
His PA is rather low, when Carlos Vela returns from loan, i will probably sell walcott off and adebayor or eduardo to make room for bendtner for 4 strikers.... what do you think? Arsenal have too many strikers for my liking, van persie and carlos vela are definate keeps.
Keep Walcott and use him as a super-sub. He's excellent off the bench in the last 25-30 mins of a game when the defence is tiring. Either on the right wing or up front, he can cause them plenty of problems with his pace. He's played 14 games for me, all off the bench and scored 5 goals, 2 assists and 2 MOM's.
Yes there was hype but that was mostly because an English player had moved to a big English club for a pretty big fee for someone that age. I dont think he'll develop into a world class striker but he'll come pretty good. And with his pace, he'll always be dangerous. He just needs to improve his composure and finishing a little. And as far as the game goes, I think he's actually been over-rated tbh. Last season he was horrible whenever he played. He just looked completely lost on the pitch (be it because of the injury or talent, doesnt matter). But this season the few games he's played he's looked so much better on the ball. He's improved his crosses as well in the little that I've seen him. And he was electric for England a week or so ago. What I do know is that he'll develop into a MUCH better player than Lennon and SWP - the two most over-rated jokers in the England setup.
ive come to find that CA means very little in terms of a good player, as long as the player has enough points in right places.
For example Walcott is good becuase of his dribbling & pace. 2 major qaulities for a good winger
Same with Stephan Ivankovic (sp?) in FM 07. his CA was low but his high heading & jumping made him a 30 goal a season striker.
Is walcott even worth having? 
Linear Mode
