If you register for free, you will be able to post threads, vote on polls and lots more. If you have problems with the registration or logging in, please contact the administrator.
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman???
finished first season with blackburn 7th and won euro cup, really need a goalscoring midfielder that can play in the mc position.Do i go for Cahill 18mill, Guzman(feynoord, only 20)18 mill or fernandez 4mill????????
11-19-2007, 10:17 PM
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman??? Post #2
he looks good but went to newcastle, and his heading doesnt look too clever. julio baptiste is the best i have had in this position but isnt interested
11-19-2007, 11:40 PM
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman??? Post #6
baptista? not interested, surely he should be by now, if not im sure he would by january. is he even getting games for real madrid, on all the games i played his a backup lol
11-19-2007, 11:44 PM
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman??? Post #8
Are you talking about Matias Fernandez? For 4M? If so, stop wasting time and get him. The other two are not a patch on him! But somehow I doubt you're talking about Matias. The only other one I can think of is Augusto Fernandez who's not worth it.
Out of those, if you want someone who can really take control of your midfield (and assuming you're not talking about Matias) get Arteta. Guzman is not as good as Arteta imo, but is SO versatile.
11-20-2007, 12:02 AM
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman??? Post #10
it is matias. beat a host of teams to get him, but can he play well in th mc role.?? it says hes accomplished there and thats where i will play him, not behind the front two
Attacking midfielder: Cahill or Fernandez or Guzman??? 
Linear Mode
