A typical example of what I meant is the ComputerArts Projects issue47.
At first sight, you might think that they have a great Photoshop project for you to learn loads of new things. Even when you only browse through the tut, is looks fantastic. Yet, if you're used to the way of presenting, you'll dive a little deeper before spending your money...
In fact, you have to use several files which are on the CDRom, ok, I can understand that not everyone can have the same photographs, but what's worse
imo, is that to do the complete tut, you also need Illustrator, Bryce5 and Strata3D. This makes it no Photoshop tutorial, but a combined tut.
Yes, you can learn a lot, but it *is* misleading. of course they don't lie, as on the cover you only see the woman's face with the Indian tiara, not the complete image. But that is what publicity is all about
: never lie, but don't tell the whole thruth either.
Photoshop7's selection tools are great and lots of ooh's and aah's, but when talking about the MaskProPlugin, the native toolset suddenly, quote: "remains to this day long-winded and, frankly, a little dull."
There are indeed two Flaming Pear plugins for free (not for OS9)on the CD. But they are not very inspiring, and certainly not a must have in your toolbox.
I want more value for my money than that.
Edit: When I re-read this, it does sound a bit too harsh. The tutorial is still quite interesting for advanced users (you have to know all your tools like making selections from paths, adjustment layers, grouping layers etc). But, compared to a good book, it is rather expensive.